Continuing care retirement communities · California

University Retirement Community

Davis, CA · ~212 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

University Retirement Community runs at 291% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

University Retirement Community: 11.0 TCR = 291% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

University Retirement Community safety composite

University Retirement Community scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

University Retirement Community: 7.6 → 15.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 20.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.34× in 2024

University Retirement Community's TCR rose 8.2 from 7.6 in 2016 to 15.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 20.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Davis, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.0 · 291% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #126/216
  • PHOTO Progressive Care - G…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 135 inj
  • SIZE ~212 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Progressive Care - Grand Meadows (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

University Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows University Retirement Community averages 11.0 TCR (291% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

University Retirement Community TCR series: 2016=7.6 · 2017=7.8 · 2018=11.5 · 2019=13 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=20.2 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=15.8 · BLS 3.8

Where University Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #126 safest of 216 Continuing care retirement com employers in California.

University Retirement Community (212 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate University Retirement Community
University Retirement Community (212 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

University Retirement Community has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.8 3.8 25 0 0
2023 10.6 7.9 13 3 0
2022 20.2 18.1 15 14 0
2021 3.9 3.1 4 1 0
2020 8.8 7.7 14 1 0
2019 13.0 10.1 22 0 0
2018 11.5 7.0 18 0 0
2017 7.8 5.2 12 0 0
2016 7.6 3.2 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Davis

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 63 employers in Davis, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Progressive Care - Grand Meadows 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lutheran Community at Telford 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Ft. Myers 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cogir of Brentwood 11.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE SANTA CLARA FARMS LLC 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mecca Location 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Harvesting 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc. - Corona North & South 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis 24,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30290) 714 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Davis Hospital (110-3001) 621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Teichert Construction Woodland 382 FTE
NAT-TCR Milwaukee Composites, Inc. 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CSA Equipment Company 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pw Hwy Southern Roads - Davidsonville 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Roberts Automatic Products 11.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ellwood Quality Steels 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alliant Systems, LLC 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gerber Childrenswear 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE 300000170855405 - GA-Fairburn-Intermodal 212 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.