Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Paper Manufacturing · North Carolina

UPM Raflatac Mills River

Mills River, NC · ~280 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UPM Raflatac Mills River runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Paper Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

UPM Raflatac Mills River: 3.6 TCR = 110% of Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Paper Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UPM Raflatac Mills River safety composite

UPM Raflatac Mills River scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2023

UPM Raflatac Mills River injury rate improved

UPM Raflatac Mills River's TCR fell 3.1 from 4.6 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=2.0 · 2023=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322220 · Mills River, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 110% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #16/22
  • PHOTO Coveris Hazleton
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~280 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coveris Hazleton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

UPM Raflatac Mills River in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UPM Raflatac Mills River averages 3.6 TCR (110% of the Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Paper Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UPM Raflatac Mills River TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=2 · 2023=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where UPM Raflatac Mills River falls in its industry

349 Paper Bag and Coated and Treat establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 22 Paper Bag and Coated and Treat employers in North Carolina.

UPM Raflatac Mills River (280 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate UPM Raflatac Mills River
UPM Raflatac Mills River (280 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 2.8

UPM Raflatac Mills River has more employees than the Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Paper M median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.5 1.5 4 0 0
2021 2.0 1.0 5 1 0
2020 3.2 2.8 8 0 0
2019 5.1 2.8 10 3 0
2018 5.8 5.4 15 0 0
2017 3.2 1.6 5 5 0
2016 4.6 3.4 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322220 · NC · Mills River

349 Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Paper Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 33 employers in Mills River, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coveris Hazleton 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Patty Processing, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Covalence Specialty Adhesives, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charlotte Paper 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Guy M. Turner, Inc. 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schaefer Systems International, Inc. 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bowman Gray Technical Center - Research and Development 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amesbury Group Inc. 280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Linamar Light Metals-MR 566 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mills River 372 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPM Raflatac, Inc 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR GF Linamar, LLC 242 FTE
NAT-TCR Joe Christensen, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR RCF and New Hope 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Smyrna Terminal 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Always Fresh Farms, LLC 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE HQ Claysburg 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triangle Enterprises, Inc. 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Lilly Company 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marine Biological Laboratory 280 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.