Furniture, residential, rental or leasing · Maryland

Upper Marlboro Distribution Center

Upper Marlboro, MD · ~33 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Upper Marlboro Distribution Center runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Furniture, residential, rental or leasing workplace, earning a grade F.

Upper Marlboro Distribution Center: 2.9 TCR = 204% of Furniture, residential, rental or leasing BLS 1.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Upper Marlboro Distribution Center safety composite

Upper Marlboro Distribution Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2016→2019

Upper Marlboro Distribution Center injury rate improved

Upper Marlboro Distribution Center's TCR fell 5.4 from 5.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.4 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 532299 · Upper Marlboro, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.9 · 204% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO San Diego Operations
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: San Diego Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Upper Marlboro Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Upper Marlboro Distribution Center averages 2.9 TCR (204% of the Furniture, residential, rental or leasing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Upper Marlboro Distribution Center TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Upper Marlboro Distribution Center falls in its industry

159 Furniture, residential, rental establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Furniture, residential, rental employers in Maryland.

Upper Marlboro Distribution Center (33 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Upper Marlboro Distribution Center
Upper Marlboro Distribution Center (33 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Upper Marlboro Distribution Center has fewer employees than the Furniture, residential, rental or leasin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.1 0.0 2 0 0
2016 5.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

532299 · MD · Upper Marlboro

159 Furniture, residential, rental or leasing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 98 employers in Upper Marlboro, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR San Diego Operations 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The TES Group, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Expo Marketing & Services 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR All Occasions Event Rental 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amick Farms, LLC MD Hatchery 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE 201-NiSource-Cumberland MD-Indus Blvd 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Coast Construction, Inc 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2016106 - NIST Building 245 Modernization T.O. #1 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Washington DC 1,045 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3888 - East Coast Return Center 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3881 - Upper Marlboro FDC 431 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thos. Somerville Co. 368 FTE
NAT-TCR Hormel Foods Corporation 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Aptar Stratford 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Powell 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Parker Service Center - Hiawatha 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 90 Commerce Rd 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sarasota Manatee Day Program 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri-Cities Staffing 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lee's Pro shop 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.