Civil engineering services · New York

Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY

New York, NY · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY runs at 288% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Civil engineering services workplace, earning a grade F.

Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY: 1.4 TCR = 288% of Civil engineering services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY safety composite

Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY: 0.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.99× in 2020

Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY's TCR rose 2.9 from 0.0 in 2019 to 2.9 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · New York, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.4 · 288% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #9/11
  • PHOTO CURT Group - Wixom
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CURT Group - Wixom (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY averages 1.4 TCR (288% of the Civil engineering services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=2.9 · BLS 0.5

Where Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY falls in its industry

690 Civil engineering services establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 11 Civil engineering services employers in New York.

Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY (36 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY
Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY (36 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C., New York, NY has fewer employees than the Civil engineering services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · NY · New York

690 Civil engineering services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CURT Group - Wixom 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR QED 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALPROEM ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS CORP./OFICINA CENTRALES 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR B56 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CY Farms, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry W. Agle and Sons, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hansen Farms, LLC. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Preble Hill Farms LLC 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR LSNE Harvey Road 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Phillips and Jordan, Inc/Northfork Spillway Embankment 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 535 Eaton Mountain Home 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1855-FLJAC48 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anderson Technologies South, LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Specialty Contractors - Branch 027 - Tulsa, OK 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leawood Ks Store 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peak Custom Fabrication, Inc. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.