Magnetic forming machines, metalworking, manufacturing · Missouri

US Tool Group - Farmington

Farmington, MO · ~608 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

US Tool Group - Farmington runs at 268% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Magnetic forming machines, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

US Tool Group - Farmington: 8.8 TCR = 268% of Magnetic forming machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

US Tool Group - Farmington safety composite

US Tool Group - Farmington scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−39.3

2017→2024

US Tool Group - Farmington injury rate improved

US Tool Group - Farmington's TCR fell 39.3 from 39.7 in 2017 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 39.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=39.7 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0.6 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Farmington, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.8 · 268% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #9/10
  • PHOTO Ken Forging Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~608 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ken Forging Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

US Tool Group - Farmington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows US Tool Group - Farmington averages 8.8 TCR (268% of the Magnetic forming machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

US Tool Group - Farmington TCR series: 2017=39.7 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0.6 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where US Tool Group - Farmington falls in its industry

391 Magnetic forming machines, met establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 10 Magnetic forming machines, met employers in Missouri.

US Tool Group - Farmington (608 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate US Tool Group - Farmington
US Tool Group - Farmington (608 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

US Tool Group - Farmington has more employees than the Magnetic forming machines, metalworking, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.4 3 0 0
2020 0.6 0.2 2 1 0
2019 1.4 0.5 4 5 0
2018 2.1 0.8 3 10 0
2017 39.7 16.2 8 14 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · MO · Farmington

391 Magnetic forming machines, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 59 employers in Farmington, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ken Forging Inc. 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc. 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smith's Machine & Grinding, Inc. 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accurpress Inc. 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMZL : DMC2 608 FTE
STATE-SIZE MO_Maryland Heights_14000 Riverport_21111011 608 FTE
STATE-SIZE hth companies, inc. 607 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Offices at MiTek, Inc. 607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Startek - Farmington, MO 612 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkland Health Center, Liberty Street 548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkland Health Center, Liberty St. 538 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 37 418 FTE
NAT-TCR The Lakes at Litchfield 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnstone Supply Grand Rapids 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Irvine Plant #21 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Port of Catoosa 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Newkirk Electric 608 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kewaunee Scientific Corporation 608 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chino Distribution Center 608 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincolnton 608 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.