Metal cutting machine tools manufacturing · Georgia

West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc.

Douglasville, GA · ~20 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc. runs at 267% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metal cutting machine tools manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc.: 8.8 TCR = 267% of Metal cutting machine tools manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc. safety composite

West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2020→2024

West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc. injury rate improved

West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc.'s TCR fell 7.1 from 13.6 in 2020 to 6.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=13.6 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=10.1 · 2024=6.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Douglasville, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.8 · 267% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Ken Forging Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ken Forging Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc. averages 8.8 TCR (267% of the Metal cutting machine tools manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc. TCR series: 2020=13.6 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=10.1 · 2024=6.6 · BLS 3.3

Where West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc. falls in its industry

391 Metal cutting machine tools ma establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Metal cutting machine tools ma employers in Georgia.

West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc. (20 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc.
West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc. (20 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc. has fewer employees than the Metal cutting machine tools manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 10.1 0.0 2 0 0
2022 4.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 13.6 13.6 0 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · GA · Douglasville

391 Metal cutting machine tools manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 86 employers in Douglasville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ken Forging Inc. 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Tool Group - Farmington 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accurpress Inc. 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smith's Machine & Grinding, Inc. 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine foods St George 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lab 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE FUNSTON GIN 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pennington Seed - Seed Production Division (SPI) 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Six Flags Over Georgia 1,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellStar Douglas Hospital 1,069 FTE
CITY-NEAR Douglasville, GA - 04 594 FTE
CITY-NEAR DSS 593 FTE
NAT-TCR Middlesex Gases & Technologies, Inc 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Windsor Brewing Company 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Valley View Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 08030-08-08-BELLINGHAM 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Raintree 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE McNichols Scrap Iron Metal Co. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Wellington at Conroe 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Related Management Company LP The Easton 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.