Fire sprinkler system installation · North Carolina

US151: Greensboro 286 - SG

High Point, NC · ~66 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

US151: Greensboro 286 - SG runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fire sprinkler system installation workplace, earning a grade A.

US151: Greensboro 286 - SG: 0.9 TCR = 33% of Fire sprinkler system installation BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

US151: Greensboro 286 - SG safety composite

US151: Greensboro 286 - SG scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2021

US151: Greensboro 286 - SG injury rate improved

US151: Greensboro 286 - SG's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · High Point, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/212
  • PHOTO Starcon @ Marathon C…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Starcon @ Marathon Canton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

US151: Greensboro 286 - SG in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows US151: Greensboro 286 - SG averages 0.9 TCR (33% of the Fire sprinkler system installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

US151: Greensboro 286 - SG TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where US151: Greensboro 286 - SG falls in its industry

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installa establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 212 Fire sprinkler system installa employers in North Carolina.

US151: Greensboro 286 - SG (66 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate US151: Greensboro 286 - SG
US151: Greensboro 286 - SG (66 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

US151: Greensboro 286 - SG has more employees than the Fire sprinkler system installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.1 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · NC · High Point

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Starcon @ Marathon Canton 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Systems Plant Services, Inc.- Blytheville, AR NYS-Nucor Yamato 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comfort Systems USA Southeast 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manny & Lou Plumbing Contractors Inc 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clinton Field Services 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riverbend Steam Station 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salisbury Operations Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASHEVILLE OPERATIONS 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR US074: Miami 263 - SG 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas/Forth Worth/Irving, TX HVAC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Motor Carriers - 3930 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Herbalife International - Torrance 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Columbus, OH HVAC 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brandman Center for Senior Care 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark Service Center 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metropolitan Social Services 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.