Senior citizens activity centers · California

Brandman Center for Senior Care

Reseda, CA · ~66 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brandman Center for Senior Care runs at 416% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Senior citizens activity centers workplace, earning a grade F.

Brandman Center for Senior Care: 15.8 TCR = 416% of Senior citizens activity centers BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brandman Center for Senior Care safety composite

Brandman Center for Senior Care scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 19.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brandman Center for Senior Care: 10.5 → 22.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 22.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.23× in 2021

Brandman Center for Senior Care's TCR rose 12.0 from 10.5 in 2018 to 22.5 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Reseda, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.8 · 416% of ind

  • DART 19.5 DART
  • RANK #220/230
  • PHOTO Norwood Day Hab
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Norwood Day Hab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Brandman Center for Senior Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brandman Center for Senior Care averages 15.8 TCR (416% of the Senior citizens activity centers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brandman Center for Senior Care TCR series: 2018=10.5 · 2019=11 · 2020=19.2 · 2021=22.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Brandman Center for Senior Care falls in its industry

1,320 Senior citizens activity cente establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #220 safest of 230 Senior citizens activity cente employers in California.

Brandman Center for Senior Care (66 employees, TCR 15.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Brandman Center for Senior Care
Brandman Center for Senior Care (66 employees, TCR 15.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Brandman Center for Senior Care has fewer employees than the Senior citizens activity centers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 22.5 19.5 4 11 0
2020 19.2 16.3 6 7 0
2019 11.0 6.9 8 0 0
2018 10.5 3.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CA · Reseda

1,320 Senior citizens activity centers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 39 employers in Reseda, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Norwood Day Hab 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CWI-Transit 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DDS West Region STS 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Social Vocational Services - 492 15.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nuseed Americas, Inc., West Sacramento Innovation Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ORGANIC BUNCH HARVESTING 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Navco Berry Harvest 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE kings orchards, llc 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Joyce Eisenberg Keefer Medical Center 455 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eisenberg Village Campus 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Police Department, West Valley Division 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkwest Healthcare Center 210 FTE
NAT-TCR Silver Hills Health Care Center 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wrightsville Foundry 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal-Tech Industrial Corp. - a div. of Nor-Tech Industrial Corp. 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ballenger Creek Center 15.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE US151: Greensboro 286 - SG 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus, OH HVAC 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark Service Center 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metropolitan Social Services 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.