Fire sprinkler system installation · South Carolina

US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG

Myrtle Beach, SC · ~50 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Fire sprinkler system installation workplace, earning a grade C.

US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG: 2.9 TCR = 104% of Fire sprinkler system installation BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG safety composite

US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.2

2017→2021

US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG injury rate improved

US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG's TCR fell 6.2 from 7.9 in 2017 to 1.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=5.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Myrtle Beach, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 104% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #26/54
  • PHOTO C.J. Erickson Plumbi…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C.J. Erickson Plumbing Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG averages 2.9 TCR (104% of the Fire sprinkler system installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG TCR series: 2017=7.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=5 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.7 · BLS 2.8

Where US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG falls in its industry

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installa establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 54 Fire sprinkler system installa employers in South Carolina.

US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG (50 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG
US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG (50 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

US177: Myrtle Beach 217 - SG has fewer employees than the Fire sprinkler system installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.0 1.7 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 7.9 7.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · SC · Myrtle Beach

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 244 employers in Myrtle Beach, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C.J. Erickson Plumbing Co. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR IPC Lydon, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Star Service, Inc of Mobile 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southland HVAC & Construction Inc 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Langley Electric Ops 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE BEC - Goose Creek Facility 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Santee Cooper Cross 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cape Fear Utilities, LLC 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA - Grand Strand Medical Center 1,584 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Strand Health 1,257 FTE
CITY-NEAR Founders National Golf, LLC 829 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocean Lakes Service Corp. 440 FTE
NAT-TCR Sinclair Trucking Company - Salt Lake City 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cortland Build 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Alliance Environmental Group LLC -Simi Valley 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Memorial Hospital Los Banos EM 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE US149: Syracuse 162 - SG 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE AmeriCare Plus - Northern Neck 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walton Service Center 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Photon Brothers, Inc. 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.