Etching equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing · California

USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites)

Santa Clara, CA · ~1,106 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites) runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Etching equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites): 1.2 TCR = 36% of Etching equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites) safety composite

USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2019→2020

USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites) injury rate improved

USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites)'s TCR fell 0.6 from 1.5 in 2019 to 0.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.5 · 2020=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333242 · Santa Clara, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #19/32
  • PHOTO Daifuku America eFA …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~1,106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Daifuku America eFA Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites) averages 1.2 TCR (36% of the Etching equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites) TCR series: 2019=1.5 · 2020=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites) falls in its industry

133 Etching equipment, semiconduct establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 32 Etching equipment, semiconduct employers in California.

USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites) (1,106 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites)
USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites) (1,106 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 1.2

USFSO, Applied Materials, (Multi Cust. CE Sites) has more employees than the Etching equipment, semiconductor, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.9 0.8 12 0 0
2019 1.5 1.2 11 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333242 · CA · Santa Clara

133 Etching equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in Santa Clara, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Daifuku America eFA Division 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MKS Methuen 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPT Microtechnologies USA 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stainless Design Concepts 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Berkeley, CA 1,106 FTE
STATE-SIZE MBM-7 Northern CA 1,106 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA6583 RANCH 1,105 FTE
STATE-SIZE PV0978 RANCH 1,105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Campus 6,222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pure Storage 5,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120751 3,887 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620751 3,154 FTE
NAT-TCR Ross store 862 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1741 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1042 Langhorne, Pa 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 431 Philadelphia, Pa 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE INTEGRIS Southwest Medical Center 1,106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crossfire LLC Corporate office 1,106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Young Living Essential Oils - DC 1,107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sabine Pass Liquefaction Stage 3 1,105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.