787 Inlet Assembly, 767 Inlet Assembly, 787 Engine Integration · Washington

UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures

Everett, WA · ~101 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical 787 Inlet Assembly, 767 Inlet Assembly, 787 Engine Integration workplace, earning a grade B.

UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures: 2.4 TCR = 72% of 787 Inlet Assembly, 767 Inlet Assembly, 787 Engine Integration BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures safety composite

UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2017→2018

UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures injury rate improved

UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures's TCR fell 2.6 from 3.7 in 2017 to 1.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.7 · 2018=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Everett, WA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #26/47
  • PHOTO CDI - Pin Oak
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CDI - Pin Oak (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the 787 Inlet Assembly, 767 Inlet Assembly, 787 Engine Integration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures TCR series: 2017=3.7 · 2018=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures falls in its industry

650 787 Inlet Assembly, 767 Inlet establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 47 787 Inlet Assembly, 767 Inlet employers in Washington.

UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures (101 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures
UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures (101 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

UTC Aerospace Systems - Everett Aerostructures has fewer employees than the 787 Inlet Assembly, 767 Inlet Assembly, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2017 3.7 1.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · WA · Everett

650 787 Inlet Assembly, 767 Inlet Assembly, 787 Engine Integration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 271 employers in Everett, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CDI - Pin Oak 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neill Aircraft Co 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Universal Propulsion Company (Fairfield CA) 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AES Arconic Roseville 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lennar - Portland 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilcox Construction LLC 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donald B Murphy Contractors, Inc 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darigold 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA004 31,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA660 EVERETT MEDICAL CTR COLBY-EVERETT HR 3,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snohomish County Government 3,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snohomish County 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR Nokomis Flour Mill 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate & Divisions 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillside 3/4 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sloan Franklin Park 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carry-On Trailer Corporation 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohio Stamping and Machine 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE MO Admin 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nexeo Solutions - Greer 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.