Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · New York

Utica Rome Catholic Charities

Name: Utica Rome Catholic Charities Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Utica, NY · ~117 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 8.3
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Utica Rome Catholic Charities runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

Utica Rome Catholic Charities: 8.3 TCR = 218% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Utica Rome Catholic Charities safety composite

Utica Rome Catholic Charities scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 8.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers
DART rate: C 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Utica Rome Catholic Charities: 6.9 → 9.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.15× in 2023

Utica Rome Catholic Charities's TCR rose 2.9 from 6.9 in 2022 to 9.7 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Utica, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 218% of ind

DART 1.2 DART
RANK #204/336
PHOTO Joan Dr.
BOOK 2y book
INJ 13 inj
SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Joan Dr. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

This site

8.3
Joan Dr.

8.3
RCRS GA Atlant

8.3
Austin

8.3
Day Program/CS

8.3

What this shows Utica Rome Catholic Charities averages 8.3 TCR (218% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Utica Rome Catholic Charities TCR series: 2022=6.9 · 2023=9.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Utica Rome Catholic Charities falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #204 safest of 336 Group homes, intellectual and employers in New York.

Utica Rome Catholic Charities (117 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Utica Rome Catholic Charities has more employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	9.7	1.2	8	0	0
2022	6.9	2.8	5	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · NY · Utica

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 148 employers in Utica, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Joan Dr.	KEIZER, OR	8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	RCRS GA Atlanta (Metro)	ATLANTA, GA	8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Austin	DECATUR, AL	8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Day Program/CSLA	WARREN, RI	8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	O&R West Nyack	WEST NYACK	117 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Gabriel Steel Erectors, Inc	MONTGOMERY	117 FTE
STATE-SIZE	D01 NYC Modernization	NEW YORK	117 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Wm. J. Keller & sons Construction Corp.	CASTLETON ON HUDSON	117 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Resource Center for Independent Living	Utica	3,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Faxton St. Lukes	Utica	1,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR	St Elizabeth Medical Center	Utica	1,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Utica University	Utica	915 FTE
NAT-TCR	Port Allen Terminal	Baton Rouge, LA	8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Brookdale Echelon Lake	Voorhees, NJ	8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Hubbard (Walpole)	Walpole, NH	8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Franklin, MA	Franklin, MA	8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	John Aguilar & Co. Inc.	Stockton, CA	117 FTE
NAT-SIZE	American & Efird Gastonia Plant 01	Gastonia, NC	117 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Robot-o Logistics, LLC	Phoenix, AZ	117 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Radial Rialto 2	Rialto, CA	117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.