Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · California

Valley Plating Works, Inc.

Commerce, CA · ~86 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Valley Plating Works, Inc. runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

Valley Plating Works, Inc.: 3.9 TCR = 119% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Valley Plating Works, Inc. safety composite

Valley Plating Works, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2024

Valley Plating Works, Inc. injury rate improved

Valley Plating Works, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.0 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Commerce, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 119% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #34/74
  • PHOTO Nipco Inc - Odessa
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nipco Inc - Odessa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Valley Plating Works, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Valley Plating Works, Inc. averages 3.9 TCR (119% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Valley Plating Works, Inc. TCR series: 2017=1 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Valley Plating Works, Inc. falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 74 Electroplating metals and form employers in California.

Valley Plating Works, Inc. (86 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Valley Plating Works, Inc.
Valley Plating Works, Inc. (86 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Valley Plating Works, Inc. has more employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.1 2.0 0 4 0
2022 0.0 0.0 2 1 0
2021 5.4 5.4 4 0 0
2020 2.8 1.8 3 0 0
2019 6.4 3.6 4 3 0
2018 7.7 5.2 9 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · CA · Commerce

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 163 employers in Commerce, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nipco Inc - Odessa 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Finishing 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arrow Finishing, Inc. 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE MALAGA HARVEST SHOP 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Muller Ranch, LLC 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE OXNARD TERRACE 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mushroom Farms 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ferguson Complex 2,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 587 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCAM, LLC 1,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DLA3 771 FTE
NAT-TCR Whitesville Elementary School 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Paris Store 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Paducah Store 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Rogue River 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Police Department 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ralph S. Alberts Co., Inc. 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Corrosion Control 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE PHL-D 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.