Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions · Michigan

Valley Truck Parts

Grand Rapids, MI · ~254 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.0
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Valley Truck Parts runs at 241% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions workplace, earning a grade F.

Valley Truck Parts: 13.0 TCR = 241% of Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions BLS 5.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Valley Truck Parts safety composite

Valley Truck Parts scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2016→2024

Valley Truck Parts injury rate improved

Valley Truck Parts's TCR fell 3.6 from 14.6 in 2016 to 11.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.6 · 2018=13.2 · 2023=13.3 · 2024=11.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.0 · 241% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #61/61
  • PHOTO Light Vehicle Transm…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 122 inj
  • SIZE ~254 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Light Vehicle Transmissions Knoxville (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Valley Truck Parts in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Valley Truck Parts averages 13.0 TCR (241% of the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Valley Truck Parts TCR series: 2016=14.6 · 2018=13.2 · 2023=13.3 · 2024=11 · BLS 5.4

Where Valley Truck Parts falls in its industry

320 Assembly line rebuilding of au establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 61 Assembly line rebuilding of au employers in Michigan.

Valley Truck Parts (254 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Valley Truck Parts
Valley Truck Parts (254 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Valley Truck Parts has more employees than the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.0 6.0 22 0 0
2023 13.3 12.2 36 0 0
2018 13.2 7.7 36 0 0
2016 14.6 8.3 28 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · MI · Grand Rapids

320 Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Light Vehicle Transmissions Knoxville 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inland Truck Parts Company 36 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR WESTPORT MANUFACTURING (ALLENTOWN, PA) 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Global Gear & Machining 13.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Construction 254 FTE
STATE-SIZE Motor City Electric Utilities 254 FTE
STATE-SIZE Munising 254 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Enterprises 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Wheatland Steel Processing 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fought & Company, Inc. 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Washington Automated LLC 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cypress Point Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 13.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anchor Glass Container 254 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tenaris Baytown 254 FTE
NAT-SIZE 405 Brockport 254 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hubbell Realty Company 254 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.