Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · California

Valverde Construction Inc.

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~221 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Valverde Construction Inc. runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Valverde Construction Inc.: 5.4 TCR = 193% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Valverde Construction Inc. safety composite

Valverde Construction Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2016→2024

Valverde Construction Inc. injury rate improved

Valverde Construction Inc.'s TCR fell 4.2 from 9.6 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.6 · 2017=6.4 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=5.8 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Santa Fe Springs, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 193% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #161/201
  • PHOTO New West Development…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~221 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New West Development, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Valverde Construction Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Valverde Construction Inc. averages 5.4 TCR (193% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Valverde Construction Inc. TCR series: 2016=9.6 · 2017=6.4 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=5.8 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Valverde Construction Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #161 safest of 201 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in California.

Valverde Construction Inc. (221 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Valverde Construction Inc.
Valverde Construction Inc. (221 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Valverde Construction Inc. has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 5.1 15 0 0
2023 3.2 3.2 7 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 4 0 0
2020 5.8 5.8 7 1 0
2019 5.8 3.5 5 0 0
2018 4.6 1.1 4 0 0
2017 6.4 4.8 6 2 0
2016 9.6 6.0 5 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New West Development, Inc. 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RDJE, Inc. 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SiteWorks INC. 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITM 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blessed Harvesting, Inc. 221 FTE
STATE-SIZE GGG Demolition Inc 221 FTE
STATE-SIZE BEAUMONT JUICE, INC. 221 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manning Beef, LLC 221 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Madison Pointe Care Center 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cross Pointe 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR URE 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR General Mills (Joplin) 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tremonton Mill 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anton Paar USA, Inc. 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nicolet Mill 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE C. Davis Electric Co., Inc. 221 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.