Chrome plating metals and metal products for the trade · New Jersey

Vanguard Research Industries

South Plainfield, NJ · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vanguard Research Industries runs at 271% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Chrome plating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Vanguard Research Industries: 8.9 TCR = 271% of Chrome plating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vanguard Research Industries safety composite

Vanguard Research Industries scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2024

Vanguard Research Industries injury rate improved

Vanguard Research Industries's TCR fell 3.8 from 7.5 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.5 · 2017=14.9 · 2018=16.7 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · South Plainfield, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.9 · 271% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Westside Finishing C…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westside Finishing Company Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Vanguard Research Industries in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vanguard Research Industries averages 8.9 TCR (271% of the Chrome plating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vanguard Research Industries TCR series: 2016=7.5 · 2017=14.9 · 2018=16.7 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Vanguard Research Industries falls in its industry

585 Chrome plating metals and meta establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Chrome plating metals and meta employers in New Jersey.

Vanguard Research Industries (32 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Vanguard Research Industries
Vanguard Research Industries (32 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Vanguard Research Industries has fewer employees than the Chrome plating metals and metal products median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2023 4.7 0.0 0 1 0
2022 6.3 3.2 2 0 0
2018 16.7 4.8 7 0 0
2017 14.9 7.5 5 1 0
2016 7.5 2.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · NJ · South Plainfield

585 Chrome plating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 112 employers in South Plainfield, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Westside Finishing Company Inc 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Union City 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR KC Jones Plating - Indiana 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial Electro Plating 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE New Jersey Natural Gas - Atlantic Highlands 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Squan Wireless 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tracts unlimited 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7326_16863 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSE&G NJ Projects & Construction 1,107 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSE&G NJ - DELIVERY PROJECT & CONSTRUCTION (DP&C) 868 FTE
CITY-NEAR Accurate Diagnostic Lab 492 FTE
CITY-NEAR G&W Laboratories, Inc. 363 FTE
NAT-TCR Bloomingdale Plant 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Seattle Branch 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Calhoun Millworks 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Basler Plastics, LLC 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carothers & Son, Ltd - Industrial Air Systems 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Border Pallets, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liokareas Construction Co 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Expediting Co., Inc. IND 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.