Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) · Massachusetts

Viability, Inc.

Springfield, MA · ~408 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Viability, Inc. runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) workplace, earning a grade D.

Viability, Inc.: 5.1 TCR = 135% of Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Viability, Inc. safety composite

Viability, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Viability, Inc.: 4.5 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.63× in 2023

Viability, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.3 from 4.5 in 2022 to 5.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Springfield, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 135% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #8/16
  • PHOTO ARC Industries Grove…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~408 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ARC Industries Grove City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Viability, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Viability, Inc. averages 5.1 TCR (135% of the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Viability, Inc. TCR series: 2022=4.5 · 2023=5.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Viability, Inc. falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or h establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 16 Vocational rehabilitation or h employers in Massachusetts.

Viability, Inc. (408 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Viability, Inc.
Viability, Inc. (408 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Viability, Inc. has more employees than the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitatio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.8 3.2 15 1 0
2022 4.5 1.3 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · MA · Springfield

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 215 employers in Springfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ARC Industries Grove City 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR OCW Activity Center 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Administrative Offices & Adult Services 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Easterseals Rehabilitation Center of Northwest Alabama 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 2021 408 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hopkinton 42 408 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quanterix Headquarters 408 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hayward Road 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMC - Baystate Medical Center 8,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMP - Baystate Medical Practices 1,977 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Tarp Redevelopment, LLC d/b/a MGM Springfield 1,867 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMF - Baystate Medical Practices 1,746 FTE
NAT-TCR Kondex Corporation 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Kentucky Hauling 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Upland Brewing 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mills Company 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Earth Services & Abatement 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jewish Federation of Omaha 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake St. Louis, MO (16) 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harrison Square 408 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.