Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Victorian Assisted Living Residence

Name: Victorian Assisted Living Residence Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

N Chatham, MA · ~27 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 3.1
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Victorian Assisted Living Residence runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Victorian Assisted Living Residence: 3.1 TCR = 81% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Victorian Assisted Living Residence safety composite

Victorian Assisted Living Residence scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 3.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Victorian Assisted Living Residence held a steady TCR band

Victorian Assisted Living Residence's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=12.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · N Chatham, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 81% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #32/210
PHOTO Brookdale Canton
BOOK 6y book
INJ 3 inj
SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Canton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

This site

3.1
Brookdale Cant

3.1
Azura Eau Clai

3.1
Elms of Lynchb

3.1
Windrose at Wo

3.1

What this shows Victorian Assisted Living Residence averages 3.1 TCR (81% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Victorian Assisted Living Residence TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=12.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Victorian Assisted Living Residence falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Victorian Assisted Living Residence (27 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Victorian Assisted Living Residence has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2021	0.0	0.0	0
2020	0.0	0.0	0
2019	12.2	12.2	2
2018	6.3	0.0	1
2017	0.0	0.0	0
2016	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · N Chatham

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 4 employers in N Chatham, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Brookdale Canton	CANTON, OH	3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Azura Eau Claire	EAU CLAIRE, WI	3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Elms of Lynchburg	LYNCHBURG, VA	3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Windrose at Woburn	WOBURN, MA	3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	High Profile - Dorchester	BOSTON	27 FTE
STATE-SIZE	NAES Salem Harbor Station	SALEM	27 FTE
STATE-SIZE	NORTH ANDOVER-METHUEN-MA30	METHUEN	27 FTE
STATE-SIZE	TEWKSBURY-MA47	TEWKSBURY	27 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Liberty Commons	N Chatham	241 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Broad Reach of Chatham, Inc. dba Liberty Commons	N Chatham	220 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Broad Reach Hospice LLC	N Chatham	47 FTE
NAT-TCR	NJOPC, Inc.	Edison, NJ	3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Binford Supply, LLC	Balch Springs, TX	3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	PKF-MARK III, Inc.	Newtown, PA	3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	4th Corporation	New Rockfored, ND	3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Wille Brothers Company	Oak Forest, IL	27 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Wille Brothers Company Monee	Monee, IL	27 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Concord 1	Concord, NC	27 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Logs	Canastota, NY	27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.