Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers · Georgia

Victory Packaging Atlanta

Lithia Springs, GA · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Victory Packaging Atlanta runs at 456% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Victory Packaging Atlanta: 10.0 TCR = 456% of Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Victory Packaging Atlanta safety composite

Victory Packaging Atlanta scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Victory Packaging Atlanta: 5.6 → 8.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 17.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2019

Victory Packaging Atlanta's TCR rose 3.1 from 5.6 in 2016 to 8.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 17.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424130 · Lithia Springs, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 456% of ind

  • DART 8.8 DART
  • RANK #11/11
  • PHOTO Veritiv Operating Co…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Veritiv Operating Company - PA136 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Victory Packaging Atlanta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Victory Packaging Atlanta averages 10.0 TCR (456% of the Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Victory Packaging Atlanta TCR series: 2016=5.6 · 2017=17.1 · 2018=8.7 · 2019=8.8 · BLS 2.2

Where Victory Packaging Atlanta falls in its industry

290 Boxes, paperboard and disposab establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 11 Boxes, paperboard and disposab employers in Georgia.

Victory Packaging Atlanta (34 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Victory Packaging Atlanta
Victory Packaging Atlanta (34 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Victory Packaging Atlanta has fewer employees than the Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 8.8 8.8 3 0 0
2018 8.7 8.7 3 0 0
2017 17.1 5.7 6 0 0
2016 5.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424130 · GA · Lithia Springs

290 Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 122 employers in Lithia Springs, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - PA136 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arrow Paper Corportation 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bunzl Retail Services, LLC (Greenville) 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hathaway Solutions LLC 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Total Timberland Services LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens Business Office - 1001 Prince Ave. Athens 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neese District Jackson EMC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE JACKSON EMC - NEESE 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Silver Line Building Products 897 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Chef - Skyview 673 FTE
CITY-NEAR GA-LITHI02 671 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lithia Springs, GA - Sydney Ct 655 FTE
NAT-TCR Lubbock Pipe & Precast 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Golden Gate America West SNA 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Community Addiction Recovery Enterprise - CARE St. Peter 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City Furniture - Distribution Center / Corp Office 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Victory Packaging Orlando 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suburban Water Systems - LM 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suburban Water Systems - SJH 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knoxville - 013 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.