Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers · Florida

Victory Packaging Orlando

Orlando, FL · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Victory Packaging Orlando runs at 384% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Victory Packaging Orlando: 8.4 TCR = 384% of Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Victory Packaging Orlando safety composite

Victory Packaging Orlando scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Victory Packaging Orlando held a steady TCR band

Victory Packaging Orlando's TCR held near 0.1 from 10.4 in 2016 to 10.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.4 · 2017=13.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=10.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424130 · Orlando, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 384% of ind

  • DART 7.7 DART
  • RANK #16/18
  • PHOTO RJ Schinner Branch 13
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RJ Schinner Branch 13 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Victory Packaging Orlando in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Victory Packaging Orlando averages 8.4 TCR (384% of the Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Victory Packaging Orlando TCR series: 2016=10.4 · 2017=13.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=10.3 · BLS 2.2

Where Victory Packaging Orlando falls in its industry

290 Boxes, paperboard and disposab establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 18 Boxes, paperboard and disposab employers in Florida.

Victory Packaging Orlando (34 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Victory Packaging Orlando
Victory Packaging Orlando (34 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Victory Packaging Orlando has fewer employees than the Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 10.3 7.7 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 13.2 6.6 4 0 0
2016 10.4 7.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424130 · FL · Orlando

290 Boxes, paperboard and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RJ Schinner Branch 13 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Victory Packaging Chicago 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Victory Packaging Louisville 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Massco - Wichita 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Potato F 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE POK Okeechobee Clean Energy Center 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE PFL Lauderdale Plant 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE MN8 Energy LLC - Delray Beach Office 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Regional Health Distribution Center 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Blacklick-OHIO 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Miller Building Services, Inc 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0019 2723 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Victory Packaging Atlanta 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suburban Water Systems - LM 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suburban Water Systems - SJH 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knoxville - 013 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.