Sprinkler system, building, installation · Minnesota

Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company

Saint Paul, MN · ~536 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Sprinkler system, building, installation workplace, earning a grade A.

Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company: 1.4 TCR = 50% of Sprinkler system, building, installation BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company safety composite

Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2021

Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company injury rate improved

Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company's TCR fell 1.5 from 3.1 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Saint Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/153
  • PHOTO Three Rivers Sheet M…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~536 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Three Rivers Sheet Metal, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company averages 1.4 TCR (50% of the Sprinkler system, building, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=1 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company falls in its industry

5,793 Sprinkler system, building, in establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 153 Sprinkler system, building, in employers in Minnesota.

Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company (536 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company
Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company (536 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company has more employees than the Sprinkler system, building, installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.5 0.0 10 0 0
2020 0.9 0.3 5 0 0
2019 1.2 0.9 8 0 0
2018 0.7 0.2 4 0 0
2017 1.0 0.0 6 0 0
2016 3.1 3.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MN · Saint Paul

5,793 Sprinkler system, building, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 291 employers in Saint Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Three Rivers Sheet Metal, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Massachusetts Office 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Livingston Fire Protection 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TP Mechanical 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smithfield St. James, MN 536 FTE
STATE-SIZE SkyWater Technology Foundry 536 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Maple Grove 536 FTE
STATE-SIZE AmesburyTruth - Owatonna 537 FTE
CITY-NEAR HE-Midway Corporate Campus 2,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Public Safety 2,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office, Andersen, DC1 & Golden Rule 1,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV St Josephs Hospital 1,426 FTE
NAT-TCR T/CCI Manufacturing LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Unison Drilling Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Traffic Control Services 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR JPL Global, LLC, dba, iQ Power Tools 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE McKee Foods Corporation-Sales and Marketing 536 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tektronix, Inc (50) 536 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fellowes, Inc Itasca 536 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0479 - Culver City Ca Whse 536 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.