Coding, dating, and imprinting packaging machinery manufacturing · Wisconsin

Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC

Oostburg, WI · ~91 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Coding, dating, and imprinting packaging machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC: 0.6 TCR = 17% of Coding, dating, and imprinting packaging machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC safety composite

Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC: 0.0 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2.98× in 2024

Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.0 in 2021 to 1.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Oostburg, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 17% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #2/28
  • PHOTO Thiele Technologies …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thiele Technologies Fergus Falls (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC averages 0.6 TCR (17% of the Coding, dating, and imprinting packaging machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC falls in its industry

269 Coding, dating, and imprinting establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 28 Coding, dating, and imprinting employers in Wisconsin.

Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC (91 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC
Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC (91 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Viking Masek Packaging Technologies, LLC has more employees than the Coding, dating, and imprinting packaging median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · WI · Oostburg

269 Coding, dating, and imprinting packaging machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 11 employers in Oostburg, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thiele Technologies Fergus Falls 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Dearborn Corporation 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR R.A Jones & Co. - Covington, KY 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Korber Pharma Inc - Apex 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Consolidated Construction Co., Inc. WI 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Security-Luebke Roofing Inc. 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Technical Center 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wigwam Mills 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Masters Gallery Foods, Inc - Oostburg 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dutchland Plastics, LLC 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dutchland - WI 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oostburg Concrete Products 122 FTE
NAT-TCR Facility 8 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rolls-Royce: LiftFan/LiftWorks 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Monsanto Caribe LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Parrish Construction Group 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 20850 Northeast 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Scotts Company - Lawrenceville 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Horizons Limestone 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE NCC Automated Systems, Inc. 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.