Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Florida

Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC

Palatka, FL · ~38 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC runs at 271% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC: 10.3 TCR = 271% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC safety composite

Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2018→2021

Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC injury rate improved

Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC's TCR fell 7.3 from 11.0 in 2018 to 3.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 63.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.0 · 2019=16.3 · 2020=63.6 · 2021=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Palatka, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 271% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #216/283
  • PHOTO Silverado Belmont Hi…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silverado Belmont Hills - 214 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC averages 10.3 TCR (271% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC TCR series: 2018=11 · 2019=16.3 · 2020=63.6 · 2021=3.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #216 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC (38 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC
Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC (38 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Vintage Care Senior Housing, LLC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.6 3.6 0 1 0
2020 63.6 51.7 10 6 0
2019 16.3 13.0 5 0 0
2018 11.0 11.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · Palatka

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 59 employers in Palatka, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silverado Belmont Hills - 214 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manor Care at Lely Palms 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkview Christian Retirement Community 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Augustana Elk Run LLC 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Growers Management Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smoak Groves Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alva 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSN Customer Service - North 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR FL180 Palatka Paper 922 FTE
CITY-NEAR PALATKA CENTER FOR REHAB & HEALING 830 FTE
CITY-NEAR HH-PALATHME 560 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida Putnam Hospital 413 FTE
NAT-TCR Sprinkler Systems 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Stratford Police Department 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Pacific Carlsbad Hotel, L.P. 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kansas Food Sales Office 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE CHI St. Joseph Children's Health 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-849-West Elm 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-6282-OUTLETS 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-6223-Pottery Barn 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.