Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation · Ohio

Vm Systems Inc

Toledo, OH · ~134 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vm Systems Inc runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Vm Systems Inc: 1.6 TCR = 55% of Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vm Systems Inc safety composite

Vm Systems Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Vm Systems Inc: 0.9 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 4.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Vm Systems Inc's TCR rose 0.7 from 0.9 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Toledo, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #66/300
  • PHOTO Xcel Mechanical Syst…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Xcel Mechanical Systems Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Vm Systems Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vm Systems Inc averages 1.6 TCR (55% of the Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vm Systems Inc TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Vm Systems Inc falls in its industry

5,793 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 300 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust employers in Ohio.

Vm Systems Inc (134 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Vm Systems Inc
Vm Systems Inc (134 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Vm Systems Inc has more employees than the Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collectio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2022 1.3 0.7 2 0 0
2021 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.5 0.7 2 0 0
2018 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2017 4.2 0.7 6 0 0
2016 0.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · OH · Toledo

5,793 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 551 employers in Toledo, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Xcel Mechanical Systems Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hiller Pensacola 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Combustion Services & Equipment Company 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rabine Mechanical Sysytems 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE RRSC Home Office 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perfection Group, Inc., Cincinnati 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCI Columbus Interior (582) 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Bay Packaging - Cincinnati 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toledo Assembly Complex 5,508 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Toledo Hospital 5,002 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toledo Hospital 4,912 FTE
CITY-NEAR Promedica Downtown Headquarters 3,308 FTE
NAT-TCR JR.D Construction, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Greene Enterprises Drywall, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Adhesive Packaging Specialties 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Poseidon Distribution Inc 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE University of Wisconsin Oshkosh 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haven Convalescent Home, Inc 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Xanitos Corporate 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henry Ford Cottage Hospital 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.