Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing · Massachusetts

Adhesive Packaging Specialties

Peabody, MA · ~76 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Adhesive Packaging Specialties runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Adhesive Packaging Specialties: 1.6 TCR = 47% of Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Adhesive Packaging Specialties safety composite

Adhesive Packaging Specialties scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2022→2024

Adhesive Packaging Specialties injury rate improved

Adhesive Packaging Specialties's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.4 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325520 · Peabody, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/13
  • PHOTO Cytec Engineered Mat…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Adhesive Packaging Specialties in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Adhesive Packaging Specialties averages 1.6 TCR (47% of the Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Adhesive Packaging Specialties TCR series: 2022=3.4 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Adhesive Packaging Specialties falls in its industry

287 Adhesives (except asphalt, den establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 13 Adhesives (except asphalt, den employers in Massachusetts.

Adhesive Packaging Specialties (76 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Adhesive Packaging Specialties
Adhesive Packaging Specialties (76 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Adhesive Packaging Specialties has more employees than the Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2022 3.4 1.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325520 · MA · Peabody

287 Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 86 employers in Peabody, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cytec Engineered Materials Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tremco Incorporated - Mameco Plant 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Gyspum Fort Dodge 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tailored Chemical Plant 1 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Insa Springfield Recreational 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Hadley 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOMERSET-MA45 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cutler Associates, Inc 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridgewell INC 1,115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brooksby Village 823 FTE
CITY-NEAR Analogic 8 Centennial Dr Peabody MA 652 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lahey Clinic North 503 FTE
NAT-TCR Greene Enterprises Drywall, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Imc Dmc Physicians 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR JR.D Construction, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Vm Systems Inc 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Henry Ford Medical Center Farmington Rd 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE PELOTON Inc. 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Grand Canyon Un the Herd Stop 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Austin Peay Resident Dining 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.