Nuclear power plant construction · Georgia

Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC

Waynesboro, GA · ~202 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nuclear power plant construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC: 0.4 TCR = 14% of Nuclear power plant construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC safety composite

Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2021

Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC injury rate improved

Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC's TCR fell 0.9 from 0.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Waynesboro, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/71
  • PHOTO Unbridled
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~202 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Unbridled (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC averages 0.4 TCR (14% of the Nuclear power plant construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC falls in its industry

1,605 Nuclear power plant constructi establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 71 Nuclear power plant constructi employers in Georgia.

Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC (202 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC
Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC (202 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Vogtle Unit 3 & 4 Project- CBI Services, LLC has more employees than the Nuclear power plant construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.6 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · GA · Waynesboro

1,605 Nuclear power plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 27 employers in Waynesboro, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Unbridled 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benchmark Utility Services 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Source Power LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skyhawk Solar Project 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Macon Operating - 960 Key Street 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE Food Packaging : MACON 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE Food Merchandising : MACON 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mauser Newnan 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Power Waynesboro Plant 4,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waynesboro Concrete 4,205 FTE
CITY-NEAR Richmond County Constructors, LLC 4,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vogtle 3 & 4 1,495 FTE
NAT-TCR Veritas Steel- Palatka 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR All American Washer Werks 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wunderlich Fibre Box Company 821 Clinton 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bordeaux Construction Company, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE West Palm Beach 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inteplast Films Corp 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE TEAM Industries Audubon 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE CK Contractors & Development, LLC 202 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.