Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing · California

Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc.

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~161 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc. runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc.: 3.8 TCR = 116% of Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2017→2024

Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc. injury rate improved

Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.6 from 3.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.6 · 2020=5.7 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336414 · Santa Fe Springs, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 116% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/19
  • PHOTO ABL Space Systems
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~161 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ABL Space Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc. averages 3.8 TCR (116% of the Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.6 · 2020=5.7 · 2023=6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

82 Guided missile and space vehic establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 19 Guided missile and space vehic employers in California.

Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc. (161 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc.
Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc. (161 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Votaw Precision Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Guided missile and space vehicle manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 7 0 0
2023 6.0 4.8 10 0 0
2020 5.7 4.4 9 0 0
2017 3.6 2.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336414 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

82 Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ABL Space Systems 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ULA-Harlingen 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCC Rollmet, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US AR Camden Arkansas Hwy 205 (1527) 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE La Valle Sabbia, Inc. 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Espinal FLC 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry Avocado Corporation 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-SONGS Station 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Fairview 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brashears Furniture, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR AY Manufacturing 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Reno 1625 National Guard Way 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE CGT U.S. Limited 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kleeberg SheetMetal 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prizer Painter Stove Works - Blandon 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rainier Springs 161 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.