Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished · New York

Vulcan Steam Forging

Buffalo, NY · ~22 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vulcan Steam Forging runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade D.

Vulcan Steam Forging: 5.8 TCR = 176% of Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vulcan Steam Forging safety composite

Vulcan Steam Forging scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2017→2024

Vulcan Steam Forging injury rate improved

Vulcan Steam Forging's TCR fell 3.6 from 8.7 in 2017 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.7 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=14.2 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=10.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Buffalo, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 176% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO Specialty Ring Produ…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Specialty Ring Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Vulcan Steam Forging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vulcan Steam Forging averages 5.8 TCR (176% of the Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vulcan Steam Forging TCR series: 2017=8.7 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=14.2 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=10.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=5 · BLS 3.3

Where Vulcan Steam Forging falls in its industry

241 Steel forgings made from purch establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Steel forgings made from purch employers in New York.

Vulcan Steam Forging (22 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Vulcan Steam Forging
Vulcan Steam Forging (22 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Vulcan Steam Forging has fewer employees than the Steel forgings made from purchased steel median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 10.1 10.1 2 0 0
2020 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2019 14.2 0.0 3 0 0
2018 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2017 8.7 8.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · NY · Buffalo

241 Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 532 employers in Buffalo, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Specialty Ring Products 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Hotform 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 235 Tennyson Street 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shannon Precision Fastener Plant 1 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Turek Farms Management Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Cattle LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ridgecrest Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Affinity Agriculture LLC 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buffalo General Hospital 3,556 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital of Buffalo 2,379 FTE
CITY-NEAR WNY Independent Living, Inc. 1,988 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kaleida Health Oishei Childrens Hospital 1,765 FTE
NAT-TCR Vineland Plant 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sioux Falls 139 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mission Linen Supply Newark 4900 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brightmoor Hospice 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bountiful Acres 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ottawa Rubber Company 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE PLANT 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE ComServ Gateway Opportunities 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.