Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) smelting and refining, primary · Tennessee

WACKER Polysilicon North America

Charleston, TN · ~714 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

WACKER Polysilicon North America runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) smelting and refining, primary workplace, earning a grade A.

WACKER Polysilicon North America: 1.6 TCR = 48% of Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) smelting and refining, primary BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

WACKER Polysilicon North America safety composite

WACKER Polysilicon North America scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2017→2023

WACKER Polysilicon North America injury rate improved

WACKER Polysilicon North America's TCR fell 0.7 from 2.5 in 2017 to 1.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.5 · 2018=0.8 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331410 · Charleston, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK P79
  • PHOTO HEM Fombell
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~714 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HEM Fombell (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

WACKER Polysilicon North America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows WACKER Polysilicon North America averages 1.6 TCR (48% of the Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) smelting and refining, primary BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

WACKER Polysilicon North America TCR series: 2017=2.5 · 2018=0.8 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where WACKER Polysilicon North America falls in its industry

57 Nonferrous metals (except alum establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
WACKER Polysilicon North America (714 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate WACKER Polysilicon North America
WACKER Polysilicon North America (714 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 3.6

WACKER Polysilicon North America has more employees than the Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) smel median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.8 0.3 14 0 0
2022 0.6 0.3 4 0 0
2021 2.3 1.1 9 5 0
2018 0.8 0.7 5 1 0
2017 2.5 0.7 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331410 · TN · Charleston

57 Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) smelting and refining, primary employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 17 employers in Charleston, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HEM Fombell 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kennecott Refinery 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATI Millersburg Operations 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fallon 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bonded Filter Co. LLC / DBA BFC Solutions 713 FTE
STATE-SIZE MORRISTOWN-HAMBLEN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION 713 FTE
STATE-SIZE USML, Ingram Micro Millington, TN 717 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry Co Medical Center 709 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CHA2 1,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CHA2 847 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olin Corporation - Charleston plant 259 FTE
NAT-TCR TDF Metal Finishing0427 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Silgan Containers Modesto Riverside 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Skyline Door & Hardware, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Milwaukie Stanley Infrastructure 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate 714 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cucamonga Plant 714 FTE
NAT-SIZE 337929-So Jersey Nj P&Dc 714 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyatt Regency Orlando 714 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.