Highway construction · Tennessee

Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc.

Charleston, TN · ~406 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Highway construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc.: 1.1 TCR = 40% of Highway construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. safety composite

Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc.: 0.2 → 1.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.66× in 2024

Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.8 from 0.2 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Charleston, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #11/94
  • PHOTO The Shelly Company -…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~406 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Shelly Company - Northeast Division - HMA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. averages 1.1 TCR (40% of the Highway construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.2 · 2017=1 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=1 · 2024=1 · BLS 2.8

Where Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. falls in its industry

4,078 Highway construction establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 94 Highway construction employers in Tennessee.

Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. (406 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc.
Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. (406 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. has more employees than the Highway construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.7 7 0 0
2023 1.0 0.5 6 0 0
2022 0.6 0.6 3 0 0
2021 2.4 1.7 11 0 0
2020 1.4 0.9 6 0 0
2019 1.1 0.2 3 2 0
2018 1.4 0.8 7 0 0
2017 1.0 0.8 5 0 1
2016 0.2 0.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · TN · Charleston

4,078 Highway construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 17 employers in Charleston, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Shelly Company - Northeast Division - HMA 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 905 N Lincoln 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAC Construction 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Parkway Infrastructure, LLC 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Riviana Foods 406 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bodine Aluminum, Inc.- Jackson 406 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 673 406 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 4223 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CHA2 1,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CHA2 847 FTE
CITY-NEAR WACKER Polysilicon North America 714 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olin Corporation - Charleston plant 259 FTE
NAT-TCR TBG3 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR High End Systems-ETC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Helm Mechanical 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Proyecto Cdbg R3 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Riviera Beach Fl 406 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jack B. Henderson Construction-NM 406 FTE
NAT-SIZE FairwayMarket Distribution Center 406 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1150 - College Point 406 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.