Seed processing, post-harvest for propagation · North Dakota

Wahpeton-US-Production

Wahpeton, ND · ~70 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wahpeton-US-Production runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Seed processing, post-harvest for propagation workplace, earning a grade B.

Wahpeton-US-Production: 2.7 TCR = 61% of Seed processing, post-harvest for propagation BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wahpeton-US-Production safety composite

Wahpeton-US-Production scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.1

2017→2024

Wahpeton-US-Production injury rate improved

Wahpeton-US-Production's TCR fell 8.1 from 11.8 in 2017 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115114 · Wahpeton, ND AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 61% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Cabot Packing, LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cabot Packing, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Wahpeton-US-Production in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wahpeton-US-Production averages 2.7 TCR (61% of the Seed processing, post-harvest for propagation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wahpeton-US-Production TCR series: 2017=11.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=2 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Wahpeton-US-Production falls in its industry

666 Seed processing, post-harvest establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Seed processing, post-harvest employers in North Dakota.

Wahpeton-US-Production (70 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wahpeton-US-Production
Wahpeton-US-Production (70 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Wahpeton-US-Production has fewer employees than the Seed processing, post-harvest for propag median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 11.8 10.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115114 · ND · Wahpeton

666 Seed processing, post-harvest for propagation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 39 employers in Wahpeton, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cabot Packing, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Haleiwa - Oahu, HI 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DuPont Pioneer Woodhull WOO1 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2532-Kearney, NE (Monsanto Co.) 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Olaf Anderson Construction, Inc. 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amity 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grandin Office/Receiving/North 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vibra Hospital of Central Dakotas, LLC d/b/a Vibra Hospital of Central Dakotas 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative 504 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDI Services 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR ContiTech USA, Inc. 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bobcat Doosan Wahpeton 211 FTE
NAT-TCR New Ulm 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dgdg 5, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bartlesville, OK 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Finishing Touch Millwork, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clackamas 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0051 Pasadena 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elementary 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE KMS Elementary 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.