Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation · California

Walters & Wolf Precast

Fremont, CA · ~158 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Walters & Wolf Precast runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation workplace, earning a grade C.

Walters & Wolf Precast: 2.8 TCR = 99% of Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Walters & Wolf Precast safety composite

Walters & Wolf Precast scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Walters & Wolf Precast held a steady TCR band

Walters & Wolf Precast's TCR held near 0.1 from 3.2 in 2018 to 3.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.2 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=2.2 · 2023=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Fremont, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 99% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #32/96
  • PHOTO Fleming Construction…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fleming Construction Group (Arizona) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Walters & Wolf Precast in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Walters & Wolf Precast averages 2.8 TCR (99% of the Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Walters & Wolf Precast TCR series: 2018=3.2 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=2.2 · 2023=3.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Walters & Wolf Precast falls in its industry

705 Concrete product (e.g., struct establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 96 Concrete product (e.g., struct employers in California.

Walters & Wolf Precast (158 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Walters & Wolf Precast
Walters & Wolf Precast (158 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Walters & Wolf Precast has more employees than the Concrete product (e.g., structural preca median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.3 3.3 4 0 0
2021 2.2 1.5 3 0 0
2020 3.7 2.2 5 0 0
2019 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2018 3.2 2.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · CA · Fremont

705 Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 348 employers in Fremont, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fleming Construction Group (Arizona) 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Division 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Empire Steel Erectors, L.P. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MORROW STEEL FABRICATORS 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE JAIME ZEPEDA LABOR CONTRACTING, INC. 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE GULL ISLAND FARMS 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lodi Farming, Inc. 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valle Verde FLC 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-45500 Fremont Blvd 21,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-Factory 12,707 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 517 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lam Research Corp. Fremont Campus 2,887 FTE
NAT-TCR United States Gypsum Co, Bridgeport Plant 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR County Market #287 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Space Craft MFG 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sweeney 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mt. Greylock Extended Care Facility 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE YESCO LLC - Salt Lake City, UT Gramercy Establishment 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mco - Dhl 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aerospace : Mentor 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.