Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing · Missouri

Warren Sign Co

Arnold, MO · ~38 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Warren Sign Co runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Warren Sign Co: 3.4 TCR = 102% of Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Warren Sign Co safety composite

Warren Sign Co scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.6

2016→2024

Warren Sign Co injury rate improved

Warren Sign Co's TCR fell 7.6 from 7.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339950 · Arnold, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/14
  • PHOTO YESCO LLC - Jarupa V…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: YESCO LLC - Jarupa Valley, CA Establishment (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Warren Sign Co in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Warren Sign Co averages 3.4 TCR (102% of the Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Warren Sign Co TCR series: 2016=7.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Warren Sign Co falls in its industry

405 Signs and signboards (except p establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 14 Signs and signboards (except p employers in Missouri.

Warren Sign Co (38 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Warren Sign Co
Warren Sign Co (38 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Warren Sign Co has fewer employees than the Signs and signboards (except paper, pape median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2022 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2021 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2020 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2019 8.3 8.3 3 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.6 5.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339950 · MO · Arnold

405 Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 54 employers in Arnold, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR YESCO LLC - Jarupa Valley, CA Establishment 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marketing Displays, Inc 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Visual Graphic Systems, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Desert Song LLC 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Webster Electric Cooperative 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Springs Service Center 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1514 550 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1514 453 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metal Container Corporation - Arnold Can Plant 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arnold Can Plant 317 FTE
NAT-TCR Rabe Environmental Systems, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Springfield Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Country Club of Mobile 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Plastics Engineering Company 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant Bartletts Ferry 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wastequip Williamstown 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant Wallace 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE atlas 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.