Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental · Rhode Island

Warwick Office

Warwick, RI · ~40 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Warwick Office runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental workplace, earning a grade C.

Warwick Office: 4.2 TCR = 110% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Warwick Office safety composite

Warwick Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.0

2016→2021

Warwick Office injury rate improved

Warwick Office's TCR fell 10.0 from 10.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.0 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=3.7 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Warwick, RI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 110% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO Social Vocational Se…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Social Vocational Services #152 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Rhode Island employers → · Look up another →

Warwick Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Warwick Office averages 4.2 TCR (110% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Warwick Office TCR series: 2016=10 · 2018=3 · 2019=3.7 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Warwick Office falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Rhode Island alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Companion services for disable employers in Rhode Island.

Warwick Office (40 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Warwick Office
Warwick Office (40 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Warwick Office has fewer employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.7 3.7 0 1 0
2018 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2016 10.0 10.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · RI · Warwick

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,610 rated employers in Rhode Island with headcount on file · 207 employers in Warwick, RI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Social Vocational Services #152 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fullerton / Orange 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gateways Community Services 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fulton County Rehabilitation Center, Inc. 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE ExcellRI 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Revity Electric 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cavanagh Company 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clayens EAST PROVIDENCE 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kent Hospital 1,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR RIPRO - PROVIDENCE 1,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Care New England Medical Group 1,264 FTE
CITY-NEAR PROVIDENCE (RIPRO) 1,244 FTE
NAT-TCR PSC Metals - Chattanooga 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Boehm Inc 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunoco Transportation Aloha 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Volvo Logistics Lewis Center 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pollock, SD 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koeze Company 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE TSC Fullerton 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta (ATL) 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.