Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing · New York

Wastequip New Lebanon

New Lebanon, NY · ~39 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wastequip New Lebanon runs at 295% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Wastequip New Lebanon: 9.7 TCR = 295% of Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wastequip New Lebanon safety composite

Wastequip New Lebanon scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

Wastequip New Lebanon injury rate improved

Wastequip New Lebanon's TCR fell 2.3 from 12.3 in 2016 to 10.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 13.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.3 · 2017=10.6 · 2018=10.6 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=13.4 · 2022=10.4 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=10.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332439 · New Lebanon, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.7 · 295% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Plant 3 & Shipping, …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plant 3 & Shipping, Rule Steel (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Wastequip New Lebanon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wastequip New Lebanon averages 9.7 TCR (295% of the Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wastequip New Lebanon TCR series: 2016=12.3 · 2017=10.6 · 2018=10.6 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=13.4 · 2022=10.4 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=10 · BLS 3.3

Where Wastequip New Lebanon falls in its industry

175 Containers, light gauge metal establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Containers, light gauge metal employers in New York.

Wastequip New Lebanon (39 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wastequip New Lebanon
Wastequip New Lebanon (39 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Wastequip New Lebanon has fewer employees than the Containers, light gauge metal (except ca median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.0 4.0 5 0 0
2023 6.2 6.2 3 0 0
2022 10.4 8.3 5 0 0
2021 13.4 6.7 6 0 0
2020 9.3 4.6 4 0 0
2019 4.8 2.4 2 0 0
2018 10.6 10.6 4 0 0
2017 10.6 5.3 4 0 0
2016 12.3 9.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332439 · NY · New Lebanon

175 Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plant 3 & Shipping, Rule Steel 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roll Offs of America 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 7, Rule Steel 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rule Steel Plant 7 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Woody Hill Farms, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bergen Farms LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora - Oakwood Dairy, LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE MN8 Energy LLC - New York Office 39 FTE
NAT-TCR Pyles Plumbing and Utility Contractors Inc 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR SANCO Services Inc 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Scion Inc., dba Scion Steel 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Buttonwillow Warehouse Company - Corcoran Facility 9.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kerotest Manufacturing Corp. Pittsburgh, PA 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pinetop Region One 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE ITW SAP - Bedford Wire 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unique Scaffolding Systems 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.