Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing · Minnesota

Wastequip Rosemount

Rosemount, MN · ~33 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wastequip Rosemount runs at 414% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Wastequip Rosemount: 13.7 TCR = 414% of Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wastequip Rosemount safety composite

Wastequip Rosemount scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wastequip Rosemount: 6.8 → 17.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 35.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.31× in 2024

Wastequip Rosemount's TCR rose 11.1 from 6.8 in 2016 to 17.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 35.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332439 · Rosemount, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.7 · 414% of ind

  • DART 17.8 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO American Keg Company
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Keg Company (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Wastequip Rosemount in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wastequip Rosemount averages 13.7 TCR (414% of the Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wastequip Rosemount TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=16.7 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=35.1 · 2023=13.7 · 2024=17.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Wastequip Rosemount falls in its industry

175 Containers, light gauge metal establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Containers, light gauge metal employers in Minnesota.

Wastequip Rosemount (33 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wastequip Rosemount
Wastequip Rosemount (33 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Wastequip Rosemount has fewer employees than the Containers, light gauge metal (except ca median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.8 17.8 7 0 0
2023 13.7 11.0 5 0 0
2022 35.1 32.2 12 0 0
2021 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2020 16.7 10.0 5 0 0
2019 10.4 0.0 3 0 0
2018 9.2 6.1 3 0 0
2017 6.9 3.5 2 0 0
2016 6.8 6.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332439 · MN · Rosemount

175 Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 60 employers in Rosemount, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Keg Company 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wastequip Beeville 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CMC Letco (Plant 4) 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Container Products Company 13.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Perham Egg LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gorans Brothers Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Las Vegas Raiders 17150004 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loeffler Construction & Consulting 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Independent School District 196 4,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Hills Resources 1,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend, LLC 905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD 917 Rosemount 559 FTE
NAT-TCR Wood Tech 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Simplex Plant 1 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jim Reif Builders Inc 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sawtooth 13.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Washington 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Menard Electric Cooperative 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gregory, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palumbo Block Co., Inc. 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.