Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system · Michigan

Wastewater Treatment Plant

Monroe, MI · ~25 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wastewater Treatment Plant runs at 825% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

Wastewater Treatment Plant: 9.9 TCR = 825% of Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wastewater Treatment Plant safety composite

Wastewater Treatment Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wastewater Treatment Plant: 4.7 → 9.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 26.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Wastewater Treatment Plant's TCR rose 4.5 from 4.7 in 2016 to 9.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 26.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Monroe, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 825% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/20
  • PHOTO Public Works Wastewa…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Public Works Wastewater Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Wastewater Treatment Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wastewater Treatment Plant averages 9.9 TCR (825% of the Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wastewater Treatment Plant TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=4.6 · 2018=15.1 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=26.2 · 2022=9.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Wastewater Treatment Plant falls in its industry

400 Waste collection, treatment, a establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 20 Waste collection, treatment, a employers in Michigan.

Wastewater Treatment Plant (25 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Wastewater Treatment Plant
Wastewater Treatment Plant (25 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Wastewater Treatment Plant has fewer employees than the Waste collection, treatment, and disposa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 9.2 0.0 2 0 0
2021 26.2 13.1 6 0 0
2020 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2019 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 15.1 3.8 4 0 0
2017 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2016 4.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · MI · Monroe

400 Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 96 employers in Monroe, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Public Works Wastewater Division 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maintenance and Operations Facility 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Maintenance Facility 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR JCO, Inc. 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hazel Park 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayside Best Beans LLC. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-County Electric- Blanchard 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bossman Construction Co LLC 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Regional Hospital 1,041 FTE
CITY-NEAR Frenchtown 658 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gerdau - Monroe Mill 514 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Power Plant 495 FTE
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-03374 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-02754 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-01632 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 247803-Spencer Po 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0148 Plumrose USA - Council Bluffs 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE RWE Renewables Services LLC-Wildcat 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Balkamp ARC East 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE C&H Tooling, Inc. 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.