General public administration · Minnesota

Water Treatment and Distribution

Name: Water Treatment and Distribution Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Minneapolis, MN · ~245 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 10.0
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Water Treatment and Distribution runs at 313% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General public administration workplace, earning a grade F.

Water Treatment and Distribution: 10.0 TCR = 313% of General public administration BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Water Treatment and Distribution safety composite

Water Treatment and Distribution scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 10.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers
DART rate: F 6.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2018

Water Treatment and Distribution injury rate improved

Water Treatment and Distribution's TCR fell 1.0 from 10.5 in 2017 to 9.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.5 · 2018=9.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 313% of ind

DART 6.3 DART
RANK #213/275
PHOTO Yuba County Governme…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 52 inj
SIZE ~245 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Yuba County Government Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

This site

10
Yuba County Go

10
Public Works

10
Utilities

10
city of Concor

10

What this shows Water Treatment and Distribution averages 10.0 TCR (313% of the General public administration BLS benchmark).

Water Treatment and Distribution TCR series: 2017=10.5 · 2018=9.5 · BLS 3.2

Where Water Treatment and Distribution falls in its industry

1,496 General public administration establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #213 safest of 275 General public administration employers in Minnesota.

Water Treatment and Distribution (245 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Water Treatment and Distribution has more employees than the General public administration median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	9.5	6.3	25	2	0
2017	10.5	8.0	27	2	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · MN · Minneapolis

1,496 General public administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Yuba County Government Center	MARYSVILLE, CA	10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Public Works	FAIRFIELD, CA	10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Utilities	HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA	10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	city of Concord Building and Grounds	CONCORD, NC	10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Twin City Fan Companies, Ltd.	MINNEAPOLIS	245 FTE
STATE-SIZE	71232	MINNETONKA	245 FTE
STATE-SIZE	0694 - Woodbury	WOODBURY	245 FTE
STATE-SIZE	PN1V BURNSVILLE PN CLINIC	BURNSVILLE	245 FTE
CITY-NEAR	University of Minnesota Twin Cities	Minneapolis	22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR	MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER	Minneapolis	12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR	0501 - City Center	Minneapolis	8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Hennepin County Medical Center	Minneapolis	7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR	Smith Systems Transportation, Inc.	Gering, NE	10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Main Office	Waukesha, WI	10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Vecellio & Grogan-Project #172	Monroe, NC	10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Marukai Gardena	Gardena, CA	10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Superior Production LLC - Fairwood Plant	Columbus, OH	245 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Hanes Brands Inc.	Mount Airy, NC	245 FTE
NAT-SIZE	HSD Hudsonville	Hudsonville, MI	245 FTE
NAT-SIZE	JC Whitney	Lasalle, IL	245 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.