Water treatment and distribution · Minnesota

Water Treatment Plant

Eden Prairie, MN · ~35 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Water Treatment Plant runs at 496% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Water Treatment Plant: 6.0 TCR = 496% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Water Treatment Plant safety composite

Water Treatment Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2017→2024

Water Treatment Plant injury rate improved

Water Treatment Plant's TCR fell 11.6 from 14.8 in 2017 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.8 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=6.0 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Eden Prairie, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.0 · 496% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO Hardin County Water …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hardin County Water District No. 2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Water Treatment Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Water Treatment Plant averages 6.0 TCR (496% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Water Treatment Plant TCR series: 2017=14.8 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=6 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Water Treatment Plant falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Water treatment and distributi employers in Minnesota.

Water Treatment Plant (35 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Water Treatment Plant
Water Treatment Plant (35 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Water Treatment Plant has fewer employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2023 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.6 3.3 2 0 0
2020 6.5 3.3 1 1 0
2019 6.0 6.0 2 0 0
2018 7.3 4.9 3 0 0
2017 14.8 11.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · MN · Eden Prairie

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 242 employers in Eden Prairie, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hardin County Water District No. 2 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fallbrook PUD 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. - Sharon 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artesian Wastewater Management, Inc. 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dollymount 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scotch Prairie Farms LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genex Farm Systems Melrose 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Dog Power Plant 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN101 1,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN051 1,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota 1,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fortra, LLC 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR Jackson Distribution Center 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR East PA RDC 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bloomfield 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aragra - Ansen - Plant 2 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Alternatives, Inc - Crf 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE FIBA Technologies - Midvale OH 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Discover Goodwill of Southern and Western Colorado -Woodland Park 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Discover Goodwill of Southern and Western Colorado- Fountain Retail 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.