Aerosol valves manufacturing · California

Waterstone Faucets

Murrieta, CA · ~151 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Waterstone Faucets runs at 322% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aerosol valves manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Waterstone Faucets: 10.6 TCR = 322% of Aerosol valves manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Waterstone Faucets safety composite

Waterstone Faucets scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.9

2017→2024

Waterstone Faucets injury rate improved

Waterstone Faucets's TCR fell 14.9 from 20.3 in 2017 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 20.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=20.3 · 2018=10.4 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=18.8 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=9.2 · 2024=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332919 · Murrieta, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 322% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Titan Newman, INC.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 100 inj
  • SIZE ~151 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Titan Newman, INC. (0.9 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Waterstone Faucets in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Waterstone Faucets averages 10.6 TCR (322% of the Aerosol valves manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Waterstone Faucets TCR series: 2017=20.3 · 2018=10.4 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=18.8 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=9.2 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Waterstone Faucets falls in its industry

100 Aerosol valves manufacturing establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Aerosol valves manufacturing employers in California.

Waterstone Faucets (151 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Waterstone Faucets
Waterstone Faucets (151 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Waterstone Faucets has more employees than the Aerosol valves manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 1.5 6 1 0
2023 9.2 6.2 12 0 0
2022 7.5 1.5 9 1 0
2021 18.8 6.8 21 4 0
2020 4.8 2.4 6 0 0
2019 8.8 5.8 12 0 0
2018 10.4 8.8 13 0 0
2017 20.3 16.2 21 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332919 · CA · Murrieta

100 Aerosol valves manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 121 employers in Murrieta, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Titan Newman, INC. 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advance Fittings Corp. 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Affordable Lawn Sprinklers Warehouse 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydrant Repair Parts, Inc 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Delta Farm Packing 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Truitt Oilfield Maintenance Corp. 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chino Base - Bld: 0842 - 15 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lodi Pump and Irrigation, LLC 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR Loma Linda University Medical Center Murrieta 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR 22B UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES OF RANCHO SPRI-RANCHO SPRINGS MEDICAL CENTER 681 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-50540000-5054 566 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-22B 471 FTE
NAT-TCR Whiteland Hauling 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR H-H tube 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Clive Ia - 3045 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Heidtman Steel Products Inc.-Bedford Tube Mill 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Engineered Controls International, LLC (ECI) - Whitsett 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1502 Arvada 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wintonbury Care Center LLC 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willow Valley Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation 151 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.