Nursing homes · Florida

Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center

Melbourne, FL · ~156 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center: 9.1 TCR = 140% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center safety composite

Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2016→2021

Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center injury rate improved

Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center's TCR fell 5.4 from 10.5 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 16.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.5 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=12.0 · 2019=16.6 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Melbourne, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.1 · 140% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #670/809
  • PHOTO Boulevard Rehabilita…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~156 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boulevard Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center averages 9.1 TCR (140% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center TCR series: 2016=10.5 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=12 · 2019=16.6 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=5.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #670 safest of 809 Nursing homes employers in Florida.

Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center (156 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center
Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center (156 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Wave Crest Health and Rehabiltiation Center has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.2 5.2 4 0 0
2020 7.8 4.9 6 2 0
2019 16.6 10.5 19 0 0
2018 12.0 6.9 12 2 0
2017 2.4 1.6 3 0 0
2016 10.5 8.1 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · FL · Melbourne

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boulevard Rehabilitation Center 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laurel Manor Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laurels of Carson City 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillsboro Health & Rehab 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Manatee Plant 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Current Builders Construction Services Inc. 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE GL Homes Corporate Office 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delray Beach Yard 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A458 4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nextech HVACR 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health First Medical Group 1,787 FTE
NAT-TCR Wisconsin Metal Fab, LLC 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR LAS Las Vegas - 4100 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mt. Arlington Senior Living 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 5749 - Cary-Elgin 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE US TX Laporte 359A Old Underwood 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salem Distribution Center 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bannockburn 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE US063: Hartford 129 - SG 156 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.