Telecommunications carriers, wired · California

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco

San Francisco, CA · ~36 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco runs at 709% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Telecommunications carriers, wired workplace, earning a grade F.

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco: 5.0 TCR = 709% of Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS 0.7 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco safety composite

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.0

2021→2024

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco injury rate improved

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco's TCR fell 14.0 from 14.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=14.0 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.0 · 709% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/39
  • PHOTO Meriwether Lewis Con…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Meriwether Lewis Connect (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco averages 5.0 TCR (709% of the Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco TCR series: 2021=14 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=3 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco falls in its industry

537 Telecommunications carriers, w establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 39 Telecommunications carriers, w employers in California.

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco (36 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco
Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco (36 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Wave Division Holdings, LLC-San Francisco has fewer employees than the Telecommunications carriers, wired median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2022 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2021 14.0 14.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · CA · San Francisco

537 Telecommunications carriers, wired employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Meriwether Lewis Connect 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - Utuado CO 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant Engineering 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - Bo. Palmas 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE River Garden Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knight Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.H. MEEK & SONS INC. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dirt Farmer and Company 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Sheraton Desert Oasis 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Little Rapids Shawano Specialty Paper 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rolling Oaks Hospitality, Inc. 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Palms West Hospital 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 01 - Okc 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dakota County Lumber Co. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8027231 Parker Hannifin MS 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Remediation Services LLC. Corporate 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.