Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing · Rhode Island

WC Warwick

W. Warwick, RI · ~399 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

WC Warwick runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.3
industry benchmark (BLS)
34
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares WC Warwick's OSHA Total Case Rate of 2.0 to the Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (59% of benchmark) across 4 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.

Injury rate over time

WC Warwick's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.

11.522.533.5 2017201820192020 2.33.3 Industry benchmarkWC Warwick TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 332420.

Where WC Warwick falls in its industry

380 Fabricated Metal Product Manuf establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Trend analysis for WC Warwick

Between 2017 and 2020, WC Warwick's Total Case Rate held roughly steady from 2.4 to 2.3 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 3% decrease across 3 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2019, at a TCR of 1.4, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 2.4, a spread of 0.9 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 4 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.

Summed across those 4 reporting years, WC Warwick recorded 34 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 4-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 34 injuries shown on this page for WC Warwick are sourced from its own 4 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 332420 - Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2020)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

8 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 784,774 hours worked = 2.04 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
WC Warwick (this establishment) 1.96 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 4-year avg
Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 332420
Rhode Island state avg (all industries) 5.62 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by WC Warwick to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.3 2.0 9 0 0
2019 1.4 0.9 6 0 0
2018 1.8 0.9 8 0 0
2017 2.4 1.7 11 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on WC Warwick's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.

  • At 59% of the Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing benchmark, WC Warwick reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is WC Warwick's safety grade?
WC Warwick has a safety grade of B (Good Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.0 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing.
How many injuries has WC Warwick reported?
WC Warwick has reported 34 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 4 years of OSHA data (2020, 2019, 2018, 2017). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Rhode Island, and by nearby establishments in W. Warwick - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.