Columns, fractionating, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing · North Carolina

Ward Vessel And Exchanger

Charlotte, NC · ~78 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ward Vessel And Exchanger runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Columns, fractionating, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Ward Vessel And Exchanger: 1.9 TCR = 59% of Columns, fractionating, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ward Vessel And Exchanger safety composite

Ward Vessel And Exchanger scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Ward Vessel And Exchanger held a steady TCR band

Ward Vessel And Exchanger's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.8 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=2.3 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332420 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 59% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #2/8
  • PHOTO CST Industries, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CST Industries, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Ward Vessel And Exchanger in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ward Vessel And Exchanger averages 1.9 TCR (59% of the Columns, fractionating, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ward Vessel And Exchanger TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=2.3 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=1 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Ward Vessel And Exchanger falls in its industry

355 Columns, fractionating, heavy establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 8 Columns, fractionating, heavy employers in North Carolina.

Ward Vessel And Exchanger (78 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ward Vessel And Exchanger
Ward Vessel And Exchanger (78 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Ward Vessel And Exchanger has more employees than the Columns, fractionating, heavy gauge meta median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2018 2.3 1.2 2 0 0
2017 4.7 2.3 4 0 0
2016 2.8 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332420 · NC · Charlotte

355 Columns, fractionating, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CST Industries, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WC Warwick 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winchester CST Industries 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kings Mountain Generation Support Facility 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Ridge Electric Corporate Office 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forest City location 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ground Thunder Construction 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Eglin Air Force Base (1515) 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Searsport Marine Terminal 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Blackstone, VA 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood Buffalo 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pratt Retail Specialties, LLC Conyers, GA 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Patson Inc.- Gary 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE USE 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jacksonville (BAMG) 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.