Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing · Michigan

Weber Specialties Company

Schoolcraft, MI · ~89 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Weber Specialties Company runs at 398% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Weber Specialties Company: 13.1 TCR = 398% of Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Weber Specialties Company safety composite

Weber Specialties Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Weber Specialties Company: 9.3 → 15.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 16.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2024

Weber Specialties Company's TCR rose 5.9 from 9.3 in 2016 to 15.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 16.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Schoolcraft, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.1 · 398% of ind

  • DART 15.2 DART
  • RANK #17/18
  • PHOTO Riverfront Stamping …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 68 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Riverfront Stamping LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Weber Specialties Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Weber Specialties Company averages 13.1 TCR (398% of the Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Weber Specialties Company TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2019=16.9 · 2020=11.8 · 2021=8.8 · 2022=14.8 · 2023=15.2 · 2024=15.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Weber Specialties Company falls in its industry

477 Stampings (except automotive, establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 18 Stampings (except automotive, employers in Michigan.

Weber Specialties Company (89 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Weber Specialties Company
Weber Specialties Company (89 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Weber Specialties Company has more employees than the Stampings (except automotive, cans, coin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.2 15.2 15 0 0
2023 15.2 5.4 12 2 0
2022 14.8 4.9 10 5 0
2021 8.8 3.3 4 4 0
2020 11.8 5.2 8 1 0
2019 16.9 6.6 14 4 0
2016 9.3 1.5 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · MI · Schoolcraft

477 Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 6 employers in Schoolcraft, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Riverfront Stamping LLC 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wheatland Steel Processing 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AAA STAMPING INC. 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ENGEL DIVERSIFIED IND., INC. 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE West Branch SC 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Kalamazoo-Public Services-Harrison 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Balkema Excavating, Inc 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE 28_22 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schoolcraft - J. RETTENMAIER USA LP 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chem Link 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR JRUSA-Schoolcraft 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Concept Molds, LLC 25 FTE
NAT-TCR 482 Gre37 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR General Iron & Steel, Inc. 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 55442 New Castle County 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Container Products Company 13.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE California Natural Color 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE 991 Houston DC 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE State Roofing Systems Inc 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE RAL-CPIS-RALEIGH,NC 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.