Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential · New York

Weiland Woods Ln ICF

Rochester, NY · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Weiland Woods Ln ICF runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential workplace, earning a grade D.

Weiland Woods Ln ICF: 5.7 TCR = 150% of Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Weiland Woods Ln ICF safety composite

Weiland Woods Ln ICF scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Weiland Woods Ln ICF: 4.2 → 8.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.5× in 2019

Weiland Woods Ln ICF's TCR rose 4.4 from 4.2 in 2017 to 8.6 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Rochester, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 150% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK #136/336
  • PHOTO Riggins Residential,…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Riggins Residential, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Weiland Woods Ln ICF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Weiland Woods Ln ICF averages 5.7 TCR (150% of the Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Weiland Woods Ln ICF TCR series: 2017=4.2 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=8.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Weiland Woods Ln ICF falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #136 safest of 336 Intellectual and developmental employers in New York.

Weiland Woods Ln ICF (20 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Weiland Woods Ln ICF
Weiland Woods Ln ICF (20 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Weiland Woods Ln ICF has fewer employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 8.6 8.6 2 0 0
2018 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2017 4.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · NY · Rochester

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Riggins Residential, LLC 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ComServ Gateway Opportunities 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mosaic Forest City/Waukon/Clarion 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Open Door Center 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE JOHNSON POTATO FARMS LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beds & Borders, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. Minns Farms LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE H. F. Corwin & Son, Inc. 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR REN148 Riverside 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR DG Woodhaven 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0020 1773 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Electro Scientific Industries Inc - Klamath Falls, OR 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tower Grove Manor 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Plainfield, NJ CCIT 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairfield Inn and Suites South Boston 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brick CCIT 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.