Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Michigan

Wellbridge of Rochester Hills

Rochester Hills, MI · ~127 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wellbridge of Rochester Hills runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Wellbridge of Rochester Hills: 14.8 TCR = 228% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wellbridge of Rochester Hills safety composite

Wellbridge of Rochester Hills scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2016→2024

Wellbridge of Rochester Hills injury rate improved

Wellbridge of Rochester Hills's TCR fell 6.1 from 6.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 38.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.1 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=25.1 · 2021=38.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Rochester Hills, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.8 · 228% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #409/471
  • PHOTO Olive Vista Behavior…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Olive Vista Behavioral Health Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Wellbridge of Rochester Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wellbridge of Rochester Hills averages 14.8 TCR (228% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wellbridge of Rochester Hills TCR series: 2016=6.1 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=25.1 · 2021=38.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Wellbridge of Rochester Hills falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #409 safest of 471 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Michigan.

Wellbridge of Rochester Hills (127 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wellbridge of Rochester Hills
Wellbridge of Rochester Hills (127 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Wellbridge of Rochester Hills has more employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 38.4 38.4 3 30 0
2020 25.1 23.7 6 13 0
2019 11.1 5.5 8 2 0
2018 8.1 2.7 5 1 0
2016 6.1 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Rochester Hills

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 107 employers in Rochester Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Olive Vista Behavioral Health Center 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aidan Senior Living at Reedsport 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hallettsville Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MediLodge of Sault Ste. Marie 14.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Constantine CON1 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE CR Meyer - Escanaba 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marathon Petroleum Detroit MI- BSL 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay Valley Foods Wayland 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR FANUC America Corporation - Rochester Hills 1,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford- Rochester Hills Data Center 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester Hills Data Center 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR InfuSystem, Inc. - Headquarters 367 FTE
NAT-TCR PVV 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Steel Plate Fabricators 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant Maintenance South 202 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Venture Machine & Tool Inc. 14.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Producers Rice Ingredients 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crete 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mooresboro 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE All-Phase Concrete Construction, Inc. 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.