Coils, ignition, internal combustion engines, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Wells Vehicle Electronics

Fond Du Lac, WI · ~233 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wells Vehicle Electronics runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Coils, ignition, internal combustion engines, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Wells Vehicle Electronics: 1.5 TCR = 27% of Coils, ignition, internal combustion engines, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wells Vehicle Electronics safety composite

Wells Vehicle Electronics scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wells Vehicle Electronics: 0.4 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.34× in 2024

Wells Vehicle Electronics's TCR rose 2.1 from 0.4 in 2023 to 2.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336320 · Fond Du Lac, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #4/10
  • PHOTO Vitesco Technologies…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~233 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vitesco Technologies USA LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Wells Vehicle Electronics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wells Vehicle Electronics averages 1.5 TCR (27% of the Coils, ignition, internal combustion engines, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wells Vehicle Electronics TCR series: 2023=0.4 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 5.4

Where Wells Vehicle Electronics falls in its industry

216 Coils, ignition, internal comb establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 10 Coils, ignition, internal comb employers in Wisconsin.

Wells Vehicle Electronics (233 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Wells Vehicle Electronics
Wells Vehicle Electronics (233 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Wells Vehicle Electronics has more employees than the Coils, ignition, internal combustion eng median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 0.5 5 0 0
2023 0.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336320 · WI · Fond Du Lac

216 Coils, ignition, internal combustion engines, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 134 employers in Fond Du Lac, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vitesco Technologies USA LLC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vitesco Technologies 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAL ILLINOIS EQUIPMENT PLANT 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sparta, TN 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Natures Path Foods 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ornua Ingredients North America 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manitowoc Tool and Machining, LLC 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meijer 283 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercury Marine FdL Campus 3,778 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercury Marine Fond du Lac 3,735 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ahern Fond du Lac - Corporate 1,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Agnes Hospital 1,479 FTE
NAT-TCR Stamford Center for the Arts Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR American Computer Development, Inc - North Carolina 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Adviniacare Natick LLC DBA Eliot Center for Health & Rehabilitation 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR McGrath Imports, Inc (DBA: McGrath Audi of Morton Grove) 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Euclid Manufacturing 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gless Ranch, Inc 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Catherine's Village 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE A-Del Construction Company, Inc. 233 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.