Skilled nursing facilities · Idaho

Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia

Nampa, ID · ~107 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia: 11.7 TCR = 180% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia safety composite

Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.3

2018→2023

Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia injury rate improved

Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia's TCR fell 11.3 from 16.4 in 2018 to 5.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 58.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=16.4 · 2019=9.1 · 2020=58.2 · 2021=16.1 · 2023=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Nampa, ID ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 11.7 · 180% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #61/94
  • PHOTO ANBERRY TRANSITIONAL…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ANBERRY TRANSITIONAL CARE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia averages 11.7 TCR (180% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia TCR series: 2018=16.4 · 2019=9.1 · 2020=58.2 · 2021=16.1 · 2023=5.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 94 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Idaho.

Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia (107 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia
Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia (107 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.1 4.1 5 0 0
2021 16.1 16.1 9 4 0
2020 58.2 58.2 4 45 0
2019 9.1 6.5 7 0 0
2018 16.4 3.5 12 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · ID · Nampa

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 228 employers in Nampa, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ANBERRY TRANSITIONAL CARE 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Resources Health Care Fund 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harrison Springs Health Campus 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wellbrooke of Wabash 11.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Whitesides Dairy 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4054-ABS 0030 0159 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moscow #029 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2073-SW-20730011-MX 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BOI2 2,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center, Nampa (Garrity)-SAHS-ID/OR 1,047 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Nampa 922 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lactalis Nampa 863 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1237 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Arntzen Corporation 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Livestock Association, Inc 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-00667 11.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Unit #0933 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #1811 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rancho San Miguel - Madera 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE BPI Packaging, LLC. 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.