Agents and brokers, durable goods, wholesale trade · Minnesota

Central Livestock Association, Inc

South St Paul, MN · ~35 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Livestock Association, Inc runs at 531% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agents and brokers, durable goods, wholesale trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Central Livestock Association, Inc: 11.7 TCR = 531% of Agents and brokers, durable goods, wholesale trade BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Livestock Association, Inc safety composite

Central Livestock Association, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.4

2020→2023

Central Livestock Association, Inc injury rate improved

Central Livestock Association, Inc's TCR fell 16.4 from 21.9 in 2020 to 5.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 21.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=21.9 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 425120 · South St Paul, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.7 · 531% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO 2904-SAS-WY
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2904-SAS-WY (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Central Livestock Association, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Livestock Association, Inc averages 11.7 TCR (531% of the Agents and brokers, durable goods, wholesale trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Livestock Association, Inc TCR series: 2020=21.9 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=5.5 · BLS 2.2

Where Central Livestock Association, Inc falls in its industry

243 Agents and brokers, durable go establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Agents and brokers, durable go employers in Minnesota.

Central Livestock Association, Inc (35 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Livestock Association, Inc
Central Livestock Association, Inc (35 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Central Livestock Association, Inc has fewer employees than the Agents and brokers, durable goods, whole median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.5 5.5 1 0 0
2022 7.7 7.7 2 0 0
2020 21.9 10.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

425120 · MN · South St Paul

243 Agents and brokers, durable goods, wholesale trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 16 employers in South St Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2904-SAS-WY 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HC Lobalzo 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Technical Food Sales 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aircraft Spruce and Specialty #20 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dollymount 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scotch Prairie Farms LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genex Farm Systems Melrose 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Dog Power Plant 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waterous Company 267 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fury Motors 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allstate Peterbilt Group of South St Paul 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Curb Masters, Inc. 116 FTE
NAT-TCR Stedfast construction inc 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Inham - Hammond/East Lake 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Arntzen Corporation 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia 11.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Portage - Parks & Recreation and Parks & Streets Maintenance Division 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE TJN Enterprises, Inc 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Life Community Services, Inc 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard by Marriott Tampa Westshore/Airport 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.